Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 389
Length: 3:42
Plays (last 30 days): 3
A baby mouth denied the breast
A lazy bone, an eagle eye
Circling a city that's higher than the sky
And it's looking like you better do what they say
Those monkeys uptown who told you not to fuck around
Heaven's a name and the river is brown
With all the mud and the rain and never settles down
It never settles down
Your baby left you unimpressed
But no one likes a beggar slightly overdressed
Trouble comes in funky clothes
You can always find a razor lying in the road
And it's looking like you better do what they say
Those monkeys uptown who told you not to fuck around
Heaven's the name and the river is brown
With all the mud and the rain, it never settles down
It never settles down
I knew you well, I know you best
Everybody owes something to everybody else
Gabriel gave me some news to give to you
Maybe taking for granted, you'd nothing better to do
And it's looking like you better do what they say
Those monkeys uptown who told you not to fuck around
Heaven's the name and the river is brown
With all the mud and the rain, it never settles down
It never settles down
It's sooo bad
So, Bill... WTF?
If you get a chance go see him live and you'll hear a lot more variation in his music, especially if he has a band back up.
I'd like that — need to find a good way to be notified when artists I'm interested in are in town.
If you get a chance go see him live and you'll hear a lot more variation in his music, especially if he has a band back up.
And indeed, RP's copy of this song is ruined by the editing that someone has done to it.
The Chicago jury approves (at least this particular jurist).
Ditto that fucking sentiment from a different geographical segment.
Now , mauve , is a word that should never , under any circumstances , pass the lips of any self respecting male human being . Ever . Imo .
I do , however ,agree that excessive use of course language is a sure sign of the person using said course language to be "the common crutch of conversational cripple" .
You're a moralist. People have been swearing for as long as there's been civilisation (the word f*ck goes back at least to Old English). It's life, and if you went into any working-class pub you'd hear 'naughty words' as a regular part of conversation. Perhaps in 'polite' middle-class circles you wouldn't, but that's their problem. Humans need to swear and curse, and that's as much a part of civilisation as passing the port to the left or antimacassars or telling polite lies ("oh, I do love your outfit, darling!") or class snobbery. It's free expression.
The number of songs on RP with 'naughty words' can be counted on the fingers of one hand, going by my experience. Instead of getting on your hobbyhorse and taking time to write green ink moralistic rants, just hit the mute key and wait for the next song. It's simple enough, and a lot quicker and better for the blood pressure. And the idea that you can have popular music without swearing is quite funny - it's like rock 'n' roll without sex and drugs.
The Chicago jury approves (at least this particular jurist).
It genuinely disturbs me that you equate public defecation (a genuine health hazard) with naughty words.
Uptight people give dirty words way too much power.
Very well put! You killed Geechee's analogy.... offenses caused by actual physical health hazards and four letter words that have been arbitrarily deemed offensive can't be fairly equated.
One of the few concerts I have ever walked out was I&W, in 2009
So freakin boring, just emo folky crap
I am encouraged that with this CD Sam Beam has discovered the band know other sounds aside from just parroting his weepy ramblings...
Damn, that's strange, like this song...
So........ A 3 or a 7? I'll stick to a 6 for now....
If words don't mean anything (as in "why do we care about coarse language — they're just words"), then why casually use ones people deem coarse, when other words will do just as well and words don't mean anything anyway?
As to I&W, I assume that as an artist, he believes that words mean something, because they are his tools. I will also assume he opted for the coarse language purposely because it expresses his intended meaning, knowing that the coarseness would narrow the audience for his work. So good for him, whatever.
As for me and mine, coarse language in our household is punished by the offender having to put some of their own money into a jar, the proceeds of which are then used to buy toothpaste and toothbrushes for the local homeless shelter. My children will learn how to express themselves without dropping the f-bomb every other word — what they do after they leave my household is on them, but they will have the skills.
Well said and great idea. We'll be adopting the dollar-towards-cleaner-mouths concept.
If words don't mean anything (as in "why do we care about coarse language — they're just words"), then why casually use ones people deem coarse, when other words will do just as well and words don't mean anything anyway?
As to I&W, I assume that as an artist, he believes that words mean something, because they are his tools. I will also assume he opted for the coarse language purposely because it expresses his intended meaning, knowing that the coarseness would narrow the audience for his work. So good for him, whatever.
As for me and mine, coarse language in our household is punished by the offender having to put some of their own money into a jar, the proceeds of which are then used to buy toothpaste and toothbrushes for the local homeless shelter. My children will learn how to express themselves without dropping the f-bomb every other word — what they do after they leave my household is on them, but they will have the skills.
Let it go. There are hundreds of thousands of words in the English language and we've decided that 6 or 7 are "bad"? Here's an idea, let's all just agree that those last .00000001% of the words are "A-OK" (or do you prefer "swell"?) and there would be one less inconsequential thing to discuss on the 24-hour news stations... Now, if we could just get past our fear of boobs.
It genuinely disturbs me that you equate public defecation (a genuine health hazard) with naughty words.
Uptight people give dirty words way too much power.
why did the artist put it in the song?
second impression: still don't like I&W
third impression: it's just a word folks, it's only there to convey an idea
still don't like I&W...
(fuck)
...there, i feel better.
it's like rock 'n' roll without sex and drugs.
Or sex without drugs (as fart as USA is concerened).
...unbelievable, gee-gee boy!
What about hunting down kinds and injured civilians from helicopters?
Is it allowed to laugh about that one?
You're a moralist. People have been swearing for as long as there's been civilisation (the word f*ck goes back at least to Old English). It's life, and if you went into any working-class pub you'd hear 'naughty words' as a regular part of conversation. Perhaps in 'polite' middle-class circles you wouldn't, but that's their problem. Humans need to swear and curse, and that's as much a part of civilisation as passing the port to the left or antimacassars or telling polite lies ("oh, I do love your outfit, darling!") or class snobbery. It's free expression.
The number of songs on RP with 'naughty words' can be counted on the fingers of one hand, going by my experience. Instead of getting on your hobbyhorse and taking time to write green ink moralistic rants, just hit the mute key and wait for the next song. It's simple enough, and a lot quicker and better for the blood pressure. And the idea that you can have popular music without swearing is quite funny - it's like rock 'n' roll without sex and drugs.
I've never noticed censorship on RP before—is this a new policy?
I love to fart and laugh about it. I guess that makes me a 47 year old child in your book. Maybe one day you'll climb down out of your own ass. Until that day: F you.
I really don't care if he swears or not, and I don't particularly care that the song has been censored (in principle), but I don't like the way it is done, because I notice the drop-out every time it occurs and it ruins the song. The first few times I thought I was having internet glitches.
I would prefer not to hear this version of this song for that reason.
Yeah, what's up with the censoring of swear words in songs played on RP? Is it really necessary to do that on internet radio? I dunno, maybe it is because of FCC regulations... but it's disappointing and distracting.
I never noticed about the F word, but really, that is ridiculous.
Sorry ick, not the pussification of the world, don`t worry. The pussification of the US! You have no problems anymore, you have issues. No old people but senior citizens, you have "homeless" people - problems, sorry issues licked. Lay back, relax. All turns out fine, just find the right words. No action required. And regarding censorship, no, sorry, no one wants to hear (read) my opinion about what is happening in the US currently. Learned from North Korea, uh? I am in the US since 1988 on a regular basis, working for US companies since 2003, I think I am allowed to have an opinion.
It`s not you ick, but you only scratched the surface. Listen to George Carlin......
It's interesting that most of the comments deal with the sensorship issue on this song and almost nothing else. So far the majority have been in favor of removing the sensorship or remove the whole song. Are they offended by a lack of profanity? I am certainly offended by "nanny culture" but I accept RP play list policy. I can always buy the song for myself it were that important.
Having said that I would like to see "profanity sensored version" in the title of the song. It is a little difficult to know in the case of some (live performances especially) if that was the was it was recorded or a post release alteration. I feel some may have down voted the song just for the sensor principal. That may be unfair since its not the original version. Might RP consider playing the unsensored version on another channel or late at night?
another interesting thing (maybe just to me), is that this is the first song I have ever seen with nearly 100 ratings and nobody has given it a 10. Im in the 7 category and it looks like thats where the majority has it. This could be one of the most agreed upon ratings of any song on RP, as most seem to feel its a 7.
Maybe the manner in which the "censorship" was implemented was purposeful - it has an obvious effect that almost underlines the redacted word. . . strengthening its effect. . .
I saw Iron & Wine a few years ago at the Sasquatch Festival in the Gorge and they were magnificent!
Bubbles would correct you by telling you it is the Samsquantch Festival. Either way, it sounds like fun!
second impression: still don't like I&W
We're all adults here. The impact of the censorship "effect" screws up the flow of the song. Can we get this one right... it's a really nice song but that just ruins it for me.
Maybe the manner in which the "censorship" was implemented was purposeful - it has an obvious effect that almost underlines the redacted word. . . strengthening its effect. . .
I saw Iron & Wine a few years ago at the Sasquatch Festival in the Gorge and they were magnificent!
I would still listen to RP even if song's like this had fuck in them, but my small children would not and I would not listen at home. Likewise, I think that the censorship is a consideration to public businesses that play RP.
This was the conclusion I came to as well (emphasis mine).
Well, it worked for the Mumford boys! Weren't those parents surprised! I like this album because it's different form the other ones.
Agreed.
I'm surprised the term "fuck around" requires censorship, considering it's a common slang on TV and in real life, and not a rude one at that.
I would still listen to RP even if song's like this had fuck in them, but my small children would not and I would not listen at home. Likewise, I think that the censorship is a consideration to public businesses that play RP.
I like this sound too!
Yeah. Censored wtf.
Yep. Seems like the heavier the production, the less unique I&W's sound becomes.
My issue is the number of songs I end up rating a '7'. But I honestly do find a lot of song quite likeable rather than an 8 or a 6. For me, an 8 and above is something I will put on the Ipod and a 7 is on the fence to be placed in my personal heavy rotation.
Eh, its all good.
The blurring isn't on the album. Well, not in the audio... for some reason it's ***'d in the liner notes. Sam throws out the F-bomb a couple times on this album and I was kind of amused that it's sung but not printed.
The album's pretty good, by the way; not as excellent as Shepherd's Dog and a wide departure from his old stuff, but I'm particularly fond of Tree by the River
I like the song. 6.
BTW, I'm making progress reducing all of my song ratings to a more realistic expression of my appraisals, accepting that 10 is the absolute top of the scale. I must have knocked half of my 10's down to 9's by now, and have made similar progress on other ratings. I am more satisfied with the outcome. For example, a "5" to me means a song is entirely decent, in the way that Wes Bentley used "entirely decent" to describe his staple product to Kevin Spacey in "American Beauty." So, a 6 rating, "pretty good," is fairly high praise for me these days.
Edit: I just checked my own ratings list. I still have a ridiculous number of tens in there. This reappraisal thing is going to take a while. *sigh*
8