Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
I kinda feel sorry for a lot of them. It's funny that Rodriguez-Williams comes off looking bad because she didn't get a check. SHE needs to go; not sure who's going to step up though because the nomination scene up here is pretty rough. Who would want that?
She's handing out "campaign donation" checks to Freedom Caucus legislators on the chamber floor. One problem is that they're not officially running for office so what's the money for? And why not just make the donation by mail like a normal person? Making sure they know who's buttering their bread, of course.
Trump would like the government he leads to pay him billions "There is a glaring conflict of interest with Trump being on both sides of the claim," said Edward Whelan, a former lawyer at the Justice Department and a political conservative who once clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. "It is outrageous that he and those answering to him would be deciding how the government responds to these extravagant claims."
Trump doesn't want to actually BE president. He wants to USE the presidency for his own benefit and glorification.
She's handing out "campaign donation" checks to Freedom Caucus legislators on the chamber floor. One problem is that they're not officially running for office so what's the money for? And why not just make the donation by mail like a normal person? Making sure they know who's buttering their bread, of course.
why not just use the comically large bag of money with a big "$" on the side?
She's handing out "campaign donation" checks to Freedom Caucus legislators on the chamber floor. One problem is that they're not officially running for office so what's the money for? And why not just make the donation by mail like a normal person? Making sure they know who's buttering their bread, of course.
Trump would like the government he leads to pay him billions "There is a glaring conflict of interest with Trump being on both sides of the claim," said Edward Whelan, a former lawyer at the Justice Department and a political conservative who once clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. "It is outrageous that he and those answering to him would be deciding how the government responds to these extravagant claims."
