Listening to Cowboy Junkies on Radio Paradise

I'm repeating what has already been said many times here, but this pales compared to the Trinity Session version.

Posted 1 month ago by DrLex [ Reply ]

Ughhh. More crappy covers!

Posted 2 months ago by Rcallinjr [ Reply ]

I love this version, but my all-time favorite is Two Nice Girls' mashup with 'Love and Affection'. They won the 'Sweet Jane Sing-off' with it.
c.

Posted 5 months ago by cc_rider [ Reply ]

Rcallinjr wrote:

F&@&ing covers!!! Stop for the love of god!!!

In case you haven't noticed, William likes his covers (especially if they bring something new to an old track). If you're not on board with that this is probably not the right station for you.

Posted 6 months ago by siqbal [ Reply ]

Just looked this up so sharing if anyone's interested. The well known Cowboy Junkies live cover of Sweet Jane is of course from their Trinity Sessions album (recorded Nov '87, released Nov '88). This version, from 1995's 200 More Miles, was recorded at the El Mocambo in Toronto in Dec '93.

Posted 6 months ago by siqbal [ Reply ]

Rcallinjr wrote:

F&@&ing covers!!! Stop for the love of god!!!

guess someone else doesn’t like this group because they are from canada

Posted 7 months ago by jp33442 [ Reply ]

F&@&ing covers!!! Stop for the love of god!!!

Posted 7 months ago by Rcallinjr [ Reply ]

Why do I see a picture of a partially submerged hippopotamus in the app during this song?. Is the hippo named Jane? Or has the hippo eaten Jane?

I am so confused.

Posted 1 year ago by bruceandjenna [ Reply ]

OneinAUS wrote:

There is an interview with Lou Reed in which he claims this version is better than his own. I think it's in Billboard magazine (paywall, sorry...)

Lou was well known to give snappy answers to stupid questions

Posted 1 year ago by thewiseking [ Reply ]

nomnol wrote:

Wow! So much hate for CJ. Nice, positive comment mach-hog.

Never understood the hate for TCJ, could it be they are from Canada!!!!

Posted 1 year ago by jp33442 [ Reply ]

Proclivities wrote:

If it eases your mind any about the state of the world, this band was formed and named over 30 years ago. Were it such a ruinous or foreboding name we likely would've been in "the ditch" by now. (Maybe we are?)

At least now we know whose fault it is.

Posted 1 year ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

Bill_B wrote:

You're the one posting political drivel..& kind of being a dick about it.

Everyone believes their political dogma is the best. They shout past each other. It's all rubbish.

Posted 1 year ago by itsme_bygolly [ Reply ]

I like Mazzy Star

Posted 1 year ago by Tylersmyler [ Reply ]

I notice that many people here compare this cover to an original song by Lou Reed. Maybe it shouldn't be compared to anything. For me, this is a new song. Lou Reed's original is one of his masterpieces, this one isn't a masterpiece but still a quite nice and totally different song.

Posted 1 year ago by arihenrikpistol [ Reply ]

rabaak wrote:

The version off Rock In Roll Animal with all those guitar players (even the bass player) puts this one to shame.

Besides the awesome guitar intro, that's the absolute WORST version of Jane. Lou's best version is on Take No Prisoners. The Velvet's best version is on Live in 69, which includes heavenly wine and roses.

Posted 2 years ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

Not as gentle as their first album, now that some time has passed. More aggressive, and a little more edgy. Not sure if that's a good thing. I loved the serene meditative quality of the first.

Posted 2 years ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

So gently smooth. Thanks Mary Lee for introducing me to them.

Posted 2 years ago by deniseperry [ Reply ]

I always anticipate the unusual yet most welcome key change to this very cool song.

Posted 2 years ago by mralimccarley [ Reply ]

OneinAUS wrote:

There is an interview with Lou Reed in which he claims this version is better than his own. I think it's in Billboard magazine (paywall, sorry...)

Is this it? https://www.billboard.com/musi... It's a review of the album, but they quote Reed calling this “the best and most authentic version I have ever heard."

Apparently Reed liked that they included the bridge ("Heavenly wine and roses etc"), which got cut from the original recording because the rest of the band thought it sucked. Basically Lou liked this "authentic" version because it's the closest to his original idea for the song.

Here is the band commenting on their relationship with Reed on the occassion of his passing.
https://cowboyjunkies.com/tag/...

Posted 2 years ago by horseplayer [ Reply ]

Hello, cool music, i learned about this radio last week at the barber while having an haircut, i love your music, congratulations !
I have already signed in and i am happy to be here.

Posted 2 years ago by jar.sapo [ Reply ]

Proclivities wrote:

If it eases your mind any about the state of the world, this band was formed and named over 30 years ago. Were it such a ruinous or foreboding name we likely would've been in "the ditch" by now. (Maybe we are?)

No doubt. We are in the ditch.

Posted 3 years ago by itsme_bygolly [ Reply ]

mach-hog wrote:

At the Venue, Regina, SK mid ‘70s. Liked ‘em then and still do. Margot, it was evident, was all business… not surprised they have stood the test of time.

Wow! So much hate for CJ. Nice, positive comment mach-hog.

Posted 3 years ago by nomnol [ Reply ]

An audiophile favorite. It's a great recording, beginning with that first cymbal hit. Then you get Margo's great vocals. She infuses the entire song with warmth and presence.

Posted 3 years ago by garyalex [ Reply ]

At the Venue, Regina, SK mid ‘70s. Liked ‘em then and still do. Margot, it was evident, was all business… not surprised they have stood the test of time.

Posted 3 years ago by mach-hog [ Reply ]

gleongelpi wrote:

What are you? One of those nasty left-wingers? Keep your politics to yourself or take them to an appropriate website. You are not part of the solution to this country's problems. You are part of the problem.

You're the one posting political drivel..& kind of being a dick about it.

Posted 3 years ago by Bill_B [ Reply ]

Shipp wrote:

Quite alright. Don't care much for their name though. Seems like a sign of the times gravitating towards the ditch..

What are you? One of those nasty left-wingers? Keep your politics to yourself or take them to an appropriate website. You are not part of the solution to this country's problems. You are part of the problem.

Posted 3 years ago by gleongelpi [ Reply ]

A steady stream of dull that doesn't stray from the path. The lack of energy of this band is something that keeps them in the 'no thanks' category for me. Production is good and their faithful rendition to live is well done though.

Posted 3 years ago by ziakut [ Reply ]

Awful misinterpretation of this song. It was never a clever song musically but requires a singer who can handle the lyrical themes and bring them out with the punchiness they deserve. Margo fails abysmally, sorry. Her limited, mid-range A-to-F vocal spectrum and lounge-band treatment makes me glad this band never covered "What I Like About You".

Posted 3 years ago by tinypriest [ Reply ]

There is an interview with Lou Reed in which he claims this version is better than his own. I think it's in Billboard magazine (paywall, sorry...)

Posted 4 years ago by OneinAUS [ Reply ]

dublanica wrote:

It is an interesting version; but, it misses the "edge" of the original.

But it makes up with other qualities. Lots of other qualities.

Cowboy Junkies do covers better than just about any other band I can think of.

Posted 4 years ago by westslope [ Reply ]

Lou Reed in his present state could produce a version better than this.

Posted 4 years ago by thewiseking [ Reply ]

mattenuttall wrote:

You're correct about the recording in the Trinity Church in Toronto. As noted in an earlier forum post, it was recorded around a single microphone. If you have a good stereo system, you can hear the echo-hum of the empty church, especially in the opening track. I agree that's their best album. But I think "River Waltz" is their best song.

Yeah, that's a great disc to audition audio gear. Straight to digital, you can practically hear the size of the place just from the echo.
c.

Posted 4 years ago by cc_rider [ Reply ]

rabaak wrote:

It is an Ok cover. A lot of people have played this. Phish, Mott the Hoople, REM, Brownsville Station, Greg Kihn and the original Velvet Underground (with Lou Reed). None do justice to the rendition that the live Lou Reed Rock 'n' Roll Animal does.

My favorite version of all time, besides the original(s) of course, is Two Nice Girl's.
Sweet Jane/Love and Affection. Absolutely epic.

They won the 'Sweet Jane Contest' with it in Austin one year.
c.

Posted 4 years ago by cc_rider [ Reply ]

msymmes wrote:

Maybe their best stuff was from the Trinity Session which I think was recorded in the Trinity Church in Downtown Toronto. Reminds me of when Joe Jackson recorded in a Cathedral (in Philly?) and the acoustics and reverb, echo and such were all natural.

You're correct about the recording in the Trinity Church in Toronto. As noted in an earlier forum post, it was recorded around a single microphone. If you have a good stereo system, you can hear the echo-hum of the empty church, especially in the opening track. I agree that's their best album. But I think "River Waltz" is their best song.

Posted 4 years ago by mattenuttall [ Reply ]

Proclivities wrote:

If it eases your mind any about the state of the world, this band was formed and named over 30 years ago. Were it such a ruinous or foreboding name we likely would've been in "the ditch" by now.

Thank you, Pro

Posted 4 years ago by Shipp [ Reply ]

Thank you, Pro Proclivities wrote:

If it eases your mind any about the state of the world, this band was formed and named over 30 years ago. Were it such a ruinous or foreboding name we likely would've been in "the ditch" by now.

Posted 4 years ago by Shipp [ Reply ]

radioparadise9 wrote:

Did you vote for Moscow's Man © aka Putin's Bitch aka Donald the Traitor?
Wow - harsh!

Posted 5 years ago by BondiMusicFan [ Reply ]

msymmes wrote:

Maybe their best stuff was from the Trinity Session which I think was recorded in the Trinity Church in Downtown Toronto. Reminds me of when Joe Jackson recorded in a Cathedral (in Philly?) and the acoustics and reverb, echo and such were all natural.
Yes I remember seeing footage of that - sounded amazing!

Posted 5 years ago by BondiMusicFan [ Reply ]

Maybe their best stuff was from the Trinity Session which I think was recorded in the Trinity Church in Downtown Toronto. Reminds me of when Joe Jackson recorded in a Cathedral (in Philly?) and the acoustics and reverb, echo and such were all natural.

Posted 5 years ago by msymmes [ Reply ]

It is an interesting version; but, it misses the "edge" of the original.

Posted 5 years ago by dublanica [ Reply ]

I much prefer this to the Lou Reed version.

Posted 5 years ago by theirongiant [ Reply ]

musicmaniac wrote:

Love the Junkies' version of this song soooo much...

Me too. Very nice.

Posted 5 years ago by AbileneTexas [ Reply ]

The version off Rock In Roll Animal with all those guitar players (even the bass player) puts this one to shame.

Posted 5 years ago by rabaak [ Reply ]

dischuckin wrote:

i don't mind this version, but how about playing the original?
https://new.radioparadise.com/...
this one's been played twice this month, 0 plays for the og

Oh dischuckin, this version is so much better, and I'm a huge fan of VU

Posted 6 years ago by Greta26 [ Reply ]

Shipp wrote:

Quite alright. Don't care much for their name though. Seems like a sign of the times gravitating towards the ditch..

Did you vote for Moscow's Man © aka Putin's Bitch aka Donald the Traitor?

Posted 6 years ago by radioparadise9 [ Reply ]

Shipp wrote:

Quite alright. Don't care much for their name though. Seems like a sign of the times gravitating towards the ditch..

If it eases your mind any about the state of the world, this band was formed and named over 30 years ago. Were it such a ruinous or foreboding name we likely would've been in "the ditch" by now. (Maybe we are?)

Posted 6 years ago by Proclivities [ Reply ]

i don't mind this version, but how about playing the original?
https://new.radioparadise.com/...
this one's been played twice this month, 0 plays for the og

Posted 6 years ago by dischuckin [ Reply ]

Shipp wrote:

Quite alright. Don't care much for their name though. Seems like a sign of the times gravitating towards the ditch..

Are you saying the name "Cowboy Junkies" violates your moral principles somehow?

Posted 6 years ago by dwhayslett [ Reply ]

Fantastic cover. Check your choices, but as a cover, undeniable.

Posted 6 years ago by brapp404 [ Reply ]

Enjoyed the Trinity Session studio version of this cover.

Posted 7 years ago by rbigelo [ Reply ]

rabaak wrote:

It is an Ok cover. A lot of people have played this. Phish, Mott the Hoople, REM, Brownsville Station, Greg Kihn and the original Velvet Underground (with Lou Reed). None do justice to the rendition that the live Lou Reed Rock 'n' Roll Animal does.

That guitar intro is legendary, but the song isn't. The best version is the one Lou does on "Take No Prisoners."

Posted 7 years ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

It is an Ok cover. A lot of people have played this. Phish, Mott the Hoople, REM, Brownsville Station, Greg Kihn and the original Velvet Underground (with Lou Reed). None do justice to the rendition that the live Lou Reed Rock 'n' Roll Animal does.

Posted 7 years ago by rabaak [ Reply ]

Good radio band but live put me to sleep, good thing John Mellancamp was up next...

Posted 7 years ago by Bert7 [ Reply ]

Posted 7 years ago by Azrica [ Reply ]

Best cover for me.

Posted 7 years ago by nomnol [ Reply ]

loungelizard48 wrote:

Yup, studio version is much better.

At the danger of being pedantic the original Cowboys Junkies version of this wasn't on a studio album. The band couldn't afford a studio so used a single mic in a location they felt would be acoustically brilliant. According to Wikipedia “The music was recorded inside Toronto’s Church of the Holy Trinity on 27 November 1987, with the band circled around a single microphone. “

However I totally agree with your sentiments the original version on The Trinity Session was far superior.

Posted 7 years ago by ScottishWillie [ Reply ]

Quite alright. Don't care much for their name though. Seems like a sign of the times gravitating towards the ditch..

Posted 8 years ago by Shipp [ Reply ]

Steely_D wrote:

Agree. The tentative delicacy of their original version was what made it so special.

Yup, studio version is much better.

Posted 8 years ago by loungelizard48 [ Reply ]

Its as if they figured out how to remove any and all feeling, emotion, relevance from the song. Everything that was "cool" about the Velvets and Lou's versions is missing .This is like No Fat Milk. It's ROCKNROLL LITE

Posted 8 years ago by thewiseking [ Reply ]

dimar wrote:

This one doesn't grab me the way the studio version did. MEH

Agree. The tentative delicacy of their original version was what made it so special.

Posted 8 years ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

This one doesn't grab me the way the studio version did. MEH

Posted 8 years ago by dimar [ Reply ]

Got to love the Junkies,and this is particularly sweet! A solid eight, from the southern UK.

Posted 8 years ago by SECA_Alan [ Reply ]

Perfect! Thanks Bill.

Posted 8 years ago by paladin [ Reply ]

PopKombo wrote:

I believe if everyone had more sex, used drugs, and listened to the CJs it would put an end to intergalactic war. You have my vote.

Thank you very much, PopKombo! We humbly be dancing like bowlegged gypsy muleskinners in honor of your vote... we love this live cover... Radio Paradise is the best radio station in this galaxy....

Posted 9 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

Thanks Bill going to see them this evening in NJ.

Posted 9 years ago by Stefan_Lutz [ Reply ]

Lou was good with it. Enough said

Posted 9 years ago by maxjboxer [ Reply ]

Lazarus wrote:

Everybody in my galactic presidential campaign loves this live version as much as the studio version... we love the Cowboy Junkies... we love sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll...

I believe if everyone had more sex, used drugs, and listened to the CJs it would put an end to intergalactic war. You have my vote.

Posted 9 years ago by PopKombo [ Reply ]

Everybody in my galactic presidential campaign loves this live version as much as the studio version... we love the Cowboy Junkies... we love sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll...

Posted 9 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

cc_rider wrote:

In Austin there used to be a 'Sweet Jane' contest. Nothing but 'Sweet Jane', all night long. One year the winner was Two Nice Girls, with their version combining 'Sweet Jane' with Joan Armatrading's 'Love And Affection'. I have the CD somewhere, it is truly wonderful.

TNG also recorded the ersatz-country classic 'I Spent My Last Ten Dollars On Birth Control And Beer'.

carumba, sorry tex but that much of a meh song (sweet jane) does not seem at all interesting, yuck : ( thats just stodgy ole me, hope it was a blast!)

Posted 9 years ago by hayduke2 [ Reply ]

pugg689 wrote:

nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version

That is the worst version of the tune (ignoring the godlike Hunter/Wagner intro).
The best version is on Take No Prisoners.

Posted 9 years ago by Steely_D [ Reply ]

Is this actually a professionally recorded and mixed song? It sounds like a YouTube via an iPhone. Is it my RP stream?
Lousy rendition of a great song covered by a wonderful band.

Posted 10 years ago by ScottN [ Reply ]

Is the singer awake?

Posted 10 years ago by Dosequis [ Reply ]

Everybody in my homeless camp be dancing like bowlegged gypsy muleskinners... we love this splendiferous live version... love sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll...

Posted 10 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

In Austin there used to be a 'Sweet Jane' contest. Nothing but 'Sweet Jane', all night long. One year the winner was Two Nice Girls, with their version combining 'Sweet Jane' with Joan Armatrading's 'Love And Affection'. I have the CD somewhere, it is truly wonderful.

TNG also recorded the ersatz-country classic 'I Spent My Last Ten Dollars On Birth Control And Beer'.

Posted 10 years ago by cc_rider [ Reply ]

...heard the CJ's do this live - wanted to rate it at about 13 1/2 and then I realized that it wasn,t a Marlboro that I'd just smoked...

Posted 10 years ago by drivingunit103 [ Reply ]

Cool!! A song that sounds like Lou Reed is singing it (Levelland) --> a song that Lou Reed wrote!!

Posted 10 years ago by hencini [ Reply ]

Two Canadian songs in a row...Neil Young and Cowboy Junkies. I see what Bill did there.

Posted 10 years ago by Stratocaster [ Reply ]

this is way better than the studio version. hadn't heard it

Posted 10 years ago by blades [ Reply ]

Everybody in my mushrooming multitude of churches be dancing buck ass naked all across the holy moly world like B.F. Skinner... we love this splendiferous live version... love sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll...

Posted 10 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

I love the original. But the Junks -own- this song, I think. The studio version is a 10 for me.

Posted 11 years ago by Wizzo_oz [ Reply ]

dull.

Posted 11 years ago by ziakut [ Reply ]

I generally hate covers but I love this one.

PS: Lou Reed said this was a pretty good rendition.

Posted 11 years ago by hallogallo [ Reply ]

absolutely gorgeous... love this live version...

Posted 11 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

pvcnote wrote:

Again and again and again....???????
Twice a day???
I prefer "Once a Year"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I kinda like it 2 maybe 3 times a week

Posted 11 years ago by paradisepig [ Reply ]

beautiful cover... special to hear it live... love it love it love it...

Posted 11 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

Again and again and again....???????
Twice a day???
I prefer "Once a Year"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted 11 years ago by pvcnote [ Reply ]

I like it !

Posted 11 years ago by owchita [ Reply ]

C'mon...play the VU version. Or play "Heroin" or "Waiting for my man"

Posted 11 years ago by idiot_wind [ Reply ]

Everybody in my church loves this live cover...

Posted 11 years ago by Lazarus [ Reply ]

mcullers wrote:

Great song, but the studio version outshines this live version. The Stevie-Nicks-Shakevoice and rushed chorus lyrics in this version leave a bit to be desired. Give me the studio version any day.

Maybe, yeah...still had I been there I would have probably been quite pleased.

Posted 11 years ago by oldsaxon [ Reply ]

Great song, but the studio version outshines this live version. The Stevie-Nicks-Shakevoice and rushed chorus lyrics in this version leave a bit to be desired. Give me the studio version any day.

Posted 12 years ago by mcullers [ Reply ]

pugg689 wrote:

nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version

Apples and Oranges in my view. They are, mostly, playing different songs. Even the lyrics aren't totally shared. Lou Reed's version truly smokes while the CJ's let you enjoy their understated, but excellent, version.

Posted 12 years ago by ScottN [ Reply ]

I didn't like te studio version and don't like this any better.

I've always found her style to
seem kind of mopey. It sounds like she's perpetually bummed out. To me anyway.

Posted 12 years ago by Gregorama [ Reply ]

pugg689 wrote:

nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version

True, but I prefer this version to the CJ's studio version, for some reason.

Posted 12 years ago by Proclivities [ Reply ]

Rolllllllllllll.......another one, just like the other one. You've been holding onto it, so give me a hit!

Posted 12 years ago by Kokoloco53 [ Reply ]

I do love this version!!

Posted 12 years ago by soundlife [ Reply ]

I wish she would not whisper so loudly!

Posted 12 years ago by salzburg4321 [ Reply ]

In England after 1750, rural poverty continued to be widespread. The 'enclosure' movement of the 18th Century deprived people of land, because of this many became labourers. Wages were low and their diet was worse, and many turned to poaching to survive.

Not everything is as it seems.

romeotuma wrote:

A "poacher" is by definition "one who hunts or fishes illegally on the property of another"... and that is not some derogatory name someone else calls you— that is your name for yourself... you call yourself a common thief...

these song forums are for song comments, and I am an honest commentator...

this cover is a fave for everybody in my hotel room...

Posted 12 years ago by SquiddlyDiddly [ Reply ]

Welcome to the special Romeotuma spam/comments page. Normal service will be resumed on the next track he does not rate a 10. Thank you.

Posted 12 years ago by SquiddlyDiddly [ Reply ]

Not so much.

Posted 13 years ago by BBOGDA [ Reply ]

Cool!! From a live song that sounds like Lou Reed to a live song that was written by Lou Reed!!

Love this song in both VU and CJ trim... : )

Posted 13 years ago by hencini [ Reply ]

Soooo god for my ears :) Love her voice and this is a great cover.

Posted 13 years ago by nalle [ Reply ]

One of the few covers of any song that is decent.

Posted 13 years ago by Mita [ Reply ]

nice, but hard to out do Lou Reed, Rock N Roll Animal live version

Posted 13 years ago by pugg689 [ Reply ]

Agreed.

mirland wrote:

I prefer the Trinity Sessions recording of this track. But Margo Timmins voice is always great :)

Posted 13 years ago by andrewlevert [ Reply ]

The Trinity Sessions version of Sweet Jane is 10x better. The acoustics in that Toronto church are amazing and work perfectly for Sweet Jane.

Posted 13 years ago by andrewlevert [ Reply ]

Sweet Margo.

Posted 13 years ago by perikleshokie [ Reply ]

I like her voice, but it comes off a few notches lower than what I would expect. Just once it would be nice to see her amp it up a bit.

Posted 13 years ago by wenatchee [ Reply ]

Misterfixit wrote:

Note to Sound Board Guy: Up the singer a couple of notches; level the bass and lead axe. Otherwise.... good job of capturing ambiance. I could see the singer breathing into the mic ..

Oh yes, note to self: buy or steal this album.

Note to self:
Hire Mr Fixit as a sound man next time he's in KC....he likes bumping up the lead vocals.

Posted 13 years ago by boober [ Reply ]

Real Nice

Posted 13 years ago by whtahtefcuk [ Reply ]

alanthecowboy wrote:

It was live in the sense that it was recorded live off the floor, not multitracked, but there wasn't an audience there, so I hesitate to call it a 'live' album.

No wonder the crowd was so quiet - I thought they were just in a dream-state.

Posted 13 years ago by haresfur [ Reply ]

Vox a bit low, but the sweetness still comes through!

Posted 14 years ago by bluedot [ Reply ]

westslope wrote:

Agreed. This one is not bad. If I was Lou Reed, I would be flattered.

lol

Posted 14 years ago by bluedot [ Reply ]

I prefer the Trinity Sessions recording of this track. But Margo Timmins voice is always great :)

Posted 14 years ago by mirland [ Reply ]

Stefen wrote:

Let's just say the studio version is sublime.

Agreed. This one is not bad. If I was Lou Reed, I would be flattered.

Posted 14 years ago by westslope [ Reply ]

Stefen wrote:

Let's just say the studio version is sublime.

Yes...

Posted 14 years ago by Huey [ Reply ]

Misterfixit wrote:

Note to Sound Board Guy: Up the singer a couple of notches; level the bass and lead axe. Otherwise.... good job of capturing ambiance. I could see the singer breathing into the mic ..

Oh yes, note to self: buy or steal this album.

Note to self: hide CDs whenever funny guys from Nashville come to visit (just in case).

Posted 14 years ago by Otomi [ Reply ]

What vocal range this girl has!

Posted 14 years ago by skyguy [ Reply ]

Stefen wrote:

Let's just say the studio version is sublime.

Agreed.

Posted 14 years ago by leaf [ Reply ]

siandbeth wrote:

Could just be my cheap speakers but I wish they made her voice more pronounced.

Oh, I see mrfixit said the same thing earlier.

Posted 14 years ago by siandbeth [ Reply ]