Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2848
Length: 3:54
Plays (last 30 days): 0
I can see a washed out moon through the fog
And then a voice inside my head breaks the analogue
And says:
"Follow me down to the valley below. You know,
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul"
I survived against the will of my twisted folk
But in the deafness of my world, the silence broke
And said:
"Follow me down to the valley below. You know,
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul"
"Follow me down to the valley below. You know,
Moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul"
"My David don't you worry; this cold world is not for you.
So rest your head upon me; I have strength to carry you."
(Ghosts of the twenties rising golden summers just holding you)
"Follow me down to the valley below.
(Follow me, follow me down)
You know, moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul"
"Follow me down to the valley below
(Follow me, follow me down)
You know, moonlight is bleeding from out of your soul"
Come to us Lazarus - it's time for you to go."
Everybody in my swarming multitude of office cubicles loves this rambling and somewhat somber piano piece that ....wait...wait....LAZARUS where are you?!! This is supposed to be your comment on a song with your name! Come out, Lazarus, come out! LLRP!!
Lazarus, where are you??
I live in the hilly and rural part of Portugal. First time I heard this song was as I was dog walking listening to RP through my earphones. I was walking down to the bottom of our valley visiting my friends. It was the end of the day and an early moon was showing up in the sky. It was peaceful, warm, and life felt perfect. It was magical synchronicity with the melody and lyrics.
I love it when something like this happens.
First time hearing it.
Instant 8.
Just a few minutes later... a 9.
Great stuff!!!
A solid 10
and today PTree followed by Bach
Last winter on a concert Steven said "One of the biggest mysteries to me is, why Lazarus didn't became a megahit".
I coulnd't agree more, probably my fav.
Where did their stuff ever get played? I would have never found them if it was not for RP.
Drove 8 hours to see them in Milwaukee last Aug. Great concert even though Steven was under the weather a bit.
I coulnd't agree more, probably my fav.
Everybody in my swarming multitude of office cubicles loves this rambling and somewhat somber piano piece that ....wait...wait....LAZARUS where are you?!! This is supposed to be your comment on a song with your name! Come out, Lazarus, come out! LLRP!!
Lazarus, where are you??
Woot! A song with your name on it.
What ever happened to Romeo and Lazarus and that famous hotel room!🤔
grows thru the porcupine tree
Instant 8.
Just a few minutes later... a 9.
Great stuff!!!
Hello from Greece
Kalimaea Sas! (Good Morning)
beautiful... love it...
Woot! A song with your name on it.
You are so full of you know what. I discovered PT here a few years ago and they are now my alltime favorite band. I am 70. So just stick it punk.
Wot a load of bollocks
Go see a doctor.
Steven Wilson one of the last real great ones standing
amen
Still, it can be "natural enough" as you said; the older some people get, the more likely they are to be set in their opinions and perhaps become convinced that anything "newer" cannot compete with things from their "glory days". There is a sort of bias (conscious or not) which makes people believe that works which are older and more well-established must be better. Once an artist has the word "legendary" attached to their name, it it assumed by many, that their works can't be surpassed by a later artist. I'm sure we all notice that bias in some of these threads.
True. Also, in the long run we tend to remember the good things and forget the bad. That's just scientific fact and it couldn't be any other way or we would all end up very, very sad.
So we are confronted with the abysmal crap that the music industry is producing in the present every day, but we conveniently forgot about the crap we had to endure in the "glory days", and like to think that every single song in that time was on par with the few that we still hear and remember ... a comparison that can only look very bad for the present.
And by another well established psychological thing called the "halo effect", we extend that value judgement from the particular to the general. Since all the music we remember from "back then" is good, everything from back then must be good. And since so much of what we hear from the present is crap, everything from the present must be crap, until proven otherwise... which of course takes a few decades time :)
Maybe some people just don't share your opinion. You know better than to worry about hypothetical comparisons.
Here's the problem with opinions about creative output such as music, art, literature - even cuisine: Aesthetic opinions cannot be supported or proven through some sort of verifiable, quantitative, scientific method.
Still, it can be "natural enough" as you said; the older some people get, the more likely they are to be set in their opinions and perhaps become convinced that anything "newer" cannot compete with things from their "glory days". There is a sort of bias (conscious or not) which makes people believe that works which are older and more well-established must be better. Once an artist has the word "legendary" attached to their name, it it assumed by many, that their works can't be surpassed by a later artist. I'm sure we all notice that bias in some of these threads.
Well, if it was just a question of opinion Proclivities I would not have posted what I wrote. In the cases I obliquely referred to, folks are not familiar with Porcupine Tree.
FWIW, I find that most people who are familiar with the music and many of those are somehow or other involved in the music biz share that opinion or at least understand the foundation of that opinion.
OK, many old people do become set in their ways. But that is not what I am saying. I am saying that middled aged and older folks have busy, busy lives and little or no time to comfortably listen to new music.
I missed out on most western popular music in the late 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s because I was either in middle of nowhere and/or I was extremely busy. Mind you I did dial into modern nationalist and post-nationalist québécois pop music in the 1980s — attending Université Laval made that easier — and I feel grateful for that.
In any event, I am grateful for RP taking alternative FM radio seriously and adapting it to the digital age. RP allows me to catch up on much of what I missed. I love the RP fora. Your comments Proclivities figure among the best.
I keep telling everybody that this band is better than Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, early Genesis, on par with King Crimson, etc., and all I get are incredulous looks.
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
Maybe some people just don't share your opinion. You know better than to worry about hypothetical comparisons.
Here's the problem with opinions about creative output such as music, art, literature - even cuisine: Aesthetic opinions cannot be supported or proven through some sort of verifiable, quantitative, scientific method.
Still, it can be "natural enough" as you said; the older some people get, the more likely they are to be set in their opinions and perhaps become convinced that anything "newer" cannot compete with things from their "glory days". There is a sort of bias (conscious or not) which makes people believe that works which are older and more well-established must be better. Once an artist has the word "legendary" attached to their name, it it assumed by many, that their works can't be surpassed by a later artist. I'm sure we all notice that bias in some of these threads.
It might be so 'cause they are extremely talented! And Bill might be an exceptionally talent-sensitive person and thus managing such an excuisite-sounding radio!
I was thinking about the exact same thing few days ago, listening to "stranger by the minute".
Some more detail here, article published just a few days after you posted that!
https://www.songfacts.com/blog/interviews/steven_wilson_of_porcupine_tree/
Great interview!
I read that Steven Wilson is a big fan of XTC. Interesting. XTC has mostly fallen flat. Will listen a little harder the next time.
Currently trying to get into Kate Bush, another favourite song writer/performer of Steven Wilson. It ain't always easy.
Wilson, to our everlasting benefit, did not get discouraged and kept cranking out music.
Does anybody know what that film was supposed to be about?
Still love this what was originally a gateway song for me.
Some more detail here, article published just a few days after you posted that!
https://www.songfacts.com/blog/interviews/steven_wilson_of_porcupine_tree/
It is fine with me.
Wilson, to our everlasting benefit, did not get discouraged and kept cranking out music.
Does anybody know what that film was supposed to be about?
Still love this what was originally a gateway song for me.
mmmm
The slowed down tempo and more grown-up treatment struck a nerve.
Great comments. Like you, I keep picking up Porcupine Tree and Steven Wilson CDs. Don't have them all yet.
Get off my lawn.
smackiepipe wrote:.
Uh, this 51 year old is here to tell you that Porcupine Tree has been at the top of my listening list since I discovered them around the Stupid Dream album, and I own every commercial release of theirs, plus Steven's solo work, and the Blackfield albums.
Taking a dump is 'natural enough, I guess,' but think before you pigeon-hole an entire group of music listeners.
And get off my lawn.
Sadly, I feel the same. This just comes over as flimsy to my ear, particularly the vocals.
Well, it is your song, after all :)
I wish it were! This song is good for the ears...
hope you are having a great weekend, fredriley...
beautiful... love it...
Well, it is your song, after all :)
Lazarus is melodic, sad, tragic, and accessible. Raven that refused to sing is melodic, in a couple of spots sad, but not tragic and definitely not easily accessible.
The Raven CD is to recent Steven Wilson solo material what In Absentia was to Porcupine Tree. The best.
Wilson can now quit music, go into salmon farming or travel the world shooting pictures, and be extremely proud of what he has accomplished.
Having listened to the album quite a few more times since my original post, I have to say that I agree with you here, westslope. Thank you for your input.
You must be a big shot; famous rock bands writing songs about you, and all. ; )
So that's about 2% of the songs in the last 12 hours. Doesn't seem over-the-top.
beautiful... love it...
Obviously
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
Wot a load of bollocks
PT was played 3 times in the past 12 hours. Sorry, what's the problem?
jkamm14 wrote:
beautiful... love it...
Just curious: How so, westslope? I just started listening to SW's Raven project, so I haven't formed a strong opinion about it yet.
Lazarus is melodic, sad, tragic, and accessible. Raven that refused to sing is melodic, in a couple of spots sad, but not tragic and definitely not easily accessible.
The Raven CD is to recent Steven Wilson solo material what In Absentia was to Porcupine Tree. The best.
Wilson can now quit music, go into salmon farming or travel the world shooting pictures, and be extremely proud of what he has accomplished.
Gorgeous as always.
Quite a contrast to Steven Wilson's Raven that refused to sing project.
Just curious: How so, westslope? I just started listening to SW's Raven project, so I haven't formed a strong opinion about it yet.
Gorgeous as always.
Quite a contrast to Steven Wilson's Raven that refused to sing project.
Everybody in my church loves this song...
This is very emotive... nice piano work... love it...
Uh, this 51 year old is here to tell you that Porcupine Tree has been at the top of my listening list since I discovered them around the Stupid Dream album, and I own every commercial release of theirs, plus Steven's solo work, and the Blackfield albums.
Taking a dump is 'natural enough, I guess,' but think before you pigeon-hole an entire group of music listeners.
And get off my lawn.
Agreed.....thanks for the reply
This old fart loves prog-rock(new and old)
Yes Deadwing, Gavin is a stroke of genius as are all the members of this band. But I still skip this song every time I hear the album. Sandwitched in betweeen Shallow and Halo, it just breaks up the intensity of an otherwise phenomenal album. If it was placed next to "The Start of Something Beautiful" or Melloton Scratch, it may make better sense. But I for one am not going to mess with Steven's song placement, even and especially with my ipod. Steven will come after me, smash or shoot my ipod to kingdom come.
Mentioning Yanni in a PT thread is a laugh.
Yanni is not in the same class as Porcupine Tree
I knew it would probably piss every one off here, that's why I posted it.
Fact is though, it's true, and coming from me it's not a diss 'cuz I really like some Yanni stuff.
Uh, this 51 year old is here to tell you that Porcupine Tree has been at the top of my listening list since I discovered them around the Stupid Dream album, and I own every commercial release of theirs, plus Steven's solo work, and the Blackfield albums.
Taking a dump is 'natural enough, I guess,' but think before you pigeon-hole an entire group of music listeners.
And get off my lawn.
Don't be sorry...it's ok not to like a song. It's your opinion...and that's ok. Even if you ARE wrong.
maybe you get incredulous looks for making ridiculous statements.
Better than King Crimson I will grant you, that isn't a feat.
But better than Led Zeppelin? Seriously?
Why don't you try something reasonable, like, "Hey you should listen to this band, they are really good", people would be less likely to peg you as a loon.
Yes and this too.
I keep telling everybody that this band is better than Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, early Genesis, on par with King Crimson, etc., and all I get are incredulous looks.
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
Maybe that is true, I don't know however I don't know what this has to do with Porcupine Tree, a mainstream band that has been around for 25 years.
I keep telling everybody that this band is better than Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, early Genesis, on par with King Crimson, etc., and all I get are incredulous looks.
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
Well, in my experience — the music I love is inseparable from the time period in which I listened to it. Memories become intertwined, and are reinforced by, the music we listened to. I love hearing new music (or I wouldn't be here) but there is something special about the old music I know that newer music can never quite replicate — as much as I may love it.
Or, I could just be an old geezer set in his ways.
I keep telling everybody that this band is better than Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, early Genesis, on par with King Crimson, etc., and all I get are incredulous looks.
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
maybe you get incredulous looks for making ridiculous statements.
Better than King Crimson I will grant you, that isn't a feat.
But better than Led Zeppelin? Seriously?
Why don't you try something reasonable, like, "Hey you should listen to this band, they are really good", people would be less likely to peg you as a loon.
I keep telling everybody that this band is better than Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, early Genesis, on par with King Crimson, etc., and all I get are incredulous looks.
Here's the problem with middle-aged and old people. They have little time, energy and head space to absorb new music. Natural enough I guess.
I think the excessive love for this band stems from people realizing that there is a band out there recording NOW that is just as talented, creative, and innovative as The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Rush, The Who etc. and they don't get airplay because Clear Channel is run by a lot of tin eared corrupt ignorant soulless 75 year old golf buddies who think people should just listen to the same crap they listened to in High School and College... "Freebird" anyone? :P
Yo Dwing..you obviously have thing for this band, but I do believe your blowing their importance and musical worth WAY out of proportion..they aren't bad, but hardly some sort of musical revolution or groundbreaking band..sorry.....bring on Motley Crue (kind of kidding)
I think the excessive love for this band stems from people realizing that there is a band out there recording NOW that is just as talented, creative, and innovative as The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Rush, The Who etc. and they don't get airplay because Clear Channel is run by a lot of tin eared corrupt ignorant soulless 75 year old golf buddies who think people should just listen to the same crap they listened to in High School and College... "Freebird" anyone? :P
Very insightful actually - this totally answered that very question for me! ....as someone new to PT and trying to stay open to them, with initial thoughts of I don't fully get the "over the top' love of them, a helpful response. They are very good, but have not got under my skin - yet! Much obliged.
I think the excessive love for this band stems from people realizing that there is a band out there recording NOW that is just as talented, creative, and innovative as The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Rush, The Who etc. and they don't get airplay because Clear Channel is run by a lot of tin eared corrupt ignorant soulless 75 year old golf buddies who think people should just listen to the same crap they listened to in High School and College... "Freebird" anyone? :P
What she said...
You tell 'em Deadwing!
Nice to hear one of the gateway songs again.
I think the excessive love for this band stems from people realizing that there is a band out there recording NOW that is just as talented, creative, and innovative as The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Rush, The Who etc. and they don't get airplay because Clear Channel is run by a lot of tin eared corrupt ignorant soulless 75 year old golf buddies who think people should just listen to the same crap they listened to in High School and College... "Freebird" anyone? :P
Neither, it's Yanni.
Mentioning Yanni in a PT thread is a laugh.
Yanni is not in the same class as Porcupine Tree
Ben Gibbard never wrote anything this beautiful, and I'm not even a PT fan.
Who plays piano on this song? Barbieri or Wilson?
Neither, it's Yanni.
1wolfy: Is it longing or whistful resignation?
God, I love this band's "ordinary" songs!
Swe Tex: Be afraid. Feel the fear!
Nice to hear the gateway song again.
*gulp*
Swe Tex: Be afraid. Feel the fear!
Nice to hear the gateway song again.
Really? ANYTHING? Wow...The PT fans here are starting to scare me....
While I'm not hugely in love with this song (in fact I do like it in the proper context), it being sandwiched betweeen Shallow and Halo really makes it easy to skip whenever I listen to this CD. The first song, Deadwing, is very complex and hard rocking. Shallow is just plain knock the doors down kinda song, and Halo is an F-You to all overzealous Christians. This song just doesn't fit the mold of the others and seems out of context for me. That's why I rarely listen to it other than here. They did this song in concert for the Fear of a Blank Planet Tour and it was a real gem, made me appreciate more - but that being said, probably one of least favorite PT songs.