Listening to Jill Barber on Radio Paradise

dragon1952 wrote:

IDK man.....no matter how great the groove or the voice I can only listen to the line "oh my my" so many times before I want to start kicking the dog or something :^ /

I just give in to the groove and enjoy it. Part of my ever growing collection of dance songs for when I just want to let loose. Love this track.

Posted 3 years ago by brian.gass77551 [ Reply ]

michaelgmitchell wrote:
Too much for me.
dsn wrote:
Yeah. Same here.
Francesco_Insyde write :
La vie n'est jamais assez... ni trop !

Posted 3 years ago by francesco_insyde [ Reply ]

go good.

Posted 5 years ago by taklalaratar [ Reply ]

GONNA HAVE TO LET YOU GO, BABE.

Take care - here's a 4 to take with you

~

.

Posted 7 years ago by sfyi2001 [ Reply ]

IDK man.....no matter how great the groove or the voice I can only listen to the line "oh my my" so many times before I want to start kicking the dog or something :^ /

Posted 7 years ago by dragon1952 [ Reply ]

SteffT wrote:

I started it on a 6 and ended up with an 8, such fun!

LOL I just did the same thing!

Posted 7 years ago by RichW [ Reply ]

Oh My My.....

Posted 8 years ago by TerryS [ Reply ]

SteffT wrote:

I started it on a 6 and ended up with an 8, such fun!

from 8 to 9 me

Posted 8 years ago by CHuLoYo [ Reply ]

I started it on a 6 and ended up with an 8, such fun!

Posted 9 years ago by SteffT [ Reply ]

Saw her and her band do this at the Halifax Jazz fest a couple of years ago...amazing woman!

Posted 9 years ago by ploba [ Reply ]

What's the name of this song again :^ /

Posted 9 years ago by dragon1952 [ Reply ]

What a great song and performance! Other songs have continued to follow, but this one keeps coming back.

Posted 10 years ago by lissen [ Reply ]

Hoo Wee!! Oh my, my!!

Posted 10 years ago by tcdc52 [ Reply ]

.

Posted 10 years ago by Peter_Bradshaw [ Reply ]

This kicks ass !

Posted 10 years ago by msymmes [ Reply ]

So fun.... love it

Posted 10 years ago by Quasicoonass [ Reply ]

and I stopped playing clarinet

Posted 11 years ago by oldfart48 [ Reply ]

Snapping my fingers, tapping my toes, and wagging my head from side to side ...

Posted 11 years ago by unclehud [ Reply ]

endoboy wrote:

As a production artist, I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to say the same thing to the clueless commenters of visual art. Just because you don't like something, don't discount the skill and planning that went into it. My favorite example is the photographer Joel Peter Witkin (Whitkin?). Some of the most disturbing, grotesque stuff Ive ever seen, and very grunge, before there really was grunge, but the man had mad photography skills, before the days of Photoshop, and no mater how sick the material, it was made just the way he wanted it to be, and with great skill.

So, say you dislike it, even hate it, but don't say it sucks if you don't know the history or skills it takes to make it.

For those who have any interest in exploring the World of Joel Peter Witkin, here is a portal
https://www.edelmangallery.com/witkin33.htm

Posted 11 years ago by TerryS [ Reply ]

Knock my socks off, drop my drawers and trip over myself... Wow! The song is a blast!

Posted 11 years ago by davidfarmerie [ Reply ]

Oh, my my! I turned on CBC-TV this morning to see if the Olympics were on, but instead I found Jill Barber singing a version of this to Mamma Yamma. (Hey, it's children's television!) Jill stepped in to buck up Mamma Yamma because the toothless yam in an apron was afraid to go to the dentist. (Hey, it's children's television!)

Here's the link:

https://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/Kids+Shows/Kids%27+CBC+Music+Videos/ID/1523563696/

You should know that when I went to view this just a few minutes ago, I received a message that said the video was unavailable. I have no idea why. But for your warped viewing and listening pleasure (and to satisfy your inner child), I hope it's back online soon.

Posted 12 years ago by Grammarcop [ Reply ]

The video of this song is fantastic. Such a great tune!

Posted 12 years ago by sarah_mae [ Reply ]

fuzzy wrote:

You gotta see her live. She's so underrated.

Oh how she moves
When on the stage
Gets in a groove
She can't escape
Totally surrendered
To the spell rendered
By ghosts of lost love remembered

I'd like to see her, but it seems as if she rarely performs outside of Canada.
*edit: Oh, she does have some shows scheduled in the Northeastern U.S. and Chicago.

Posted 12 years ago by Proclivities [ Reply ]

Just what I needed to wake me up and get me through the afternoon!

Posted 12 years ago by ginniet [ Reply ]

Funsies!

Posted 12 years ago by nicolewe [ Reply ]

Businessgypsy wrote:

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

The fonts are fine. The cover's just half-finished is all. Maybe the two faces don't belong together, but there's nothing wrong with either of them. I'd actually like to know what the script is... seems like something Veer would put out but it's like finding a needle in a haystack, browsing thru font after font.

Thanks for the illumination, Scott. I'd also say the cover is as the designer, art director and publisher at https://www.outside-music.com/ intended. Obviously going for a period look, and the headline over photo block was often used in cover art from 1940 - 1960 - partly because (in the days of multiple plate stripped, masked and registered film negatives), it was less costly to do the mechanical art if you weren't dropping a lot of type out of a large four-color-process photo. The combination of a woodcut style sanserif masthead and brush font script was common in the era of hot (lead letterpress type fit into a chase) type when your choices were restricted to the sizes and fonts in the typesetter's cabinet.

This is what Barber had to say about the intended feel of the recording in an interview with the Brunswickian:

Her new album has a lounge singer aspect to it - the listener feels like they are transported back to the ‘40s in a smoky hotel bar. But more than just the era itself Barber wanted to recreate the feeling of romance in the music.

"I think I've always written songs that are pretty romantic and I think that romance has been lost in a lot of modern music so I look to the old classics. I just wanted to deliver it and bring that sound back to contemporary songs," said Barber.

Given that, the art director probably researched some classic torch and ballad cover art from the period as a reference for the finished piece. Absolutely no reason for a San Francisco company like Outside, with access to top level designers locally to just accidentally do something shoddy.

Maybe they overthought it and allowed the search for historical accuracy to overshadow mass appeal, but this is a certainty: The fonts aren't bad, as in thoughtlessly chosen. The cover's not half-finished, but finished to the standard set by Jill Barber's own concept. You may not like it from your own personal aesthetic perspective (I don't), but don't mistake the work that went into this as anything less than a professional effort to respect the recording artist's desired feel of the work.

Crikey, I thought I retired from being a Creative Director years ago. Much ado about nothing, but that's the biz.

Sorry to dredge this up 2 years later but I'm sticking with my "half finished" diagnosis. They may have gotten what they were after, but it falls flat for most of us so that means more work is needed. However, this larger version shows a little more subtle "aging" detail that in real life probably makes the art look better. I still think they needed a gothic font to balance out the frilly-ness of the two fonts they have. Or just maybe the song titles in Britannic Book.

Also, the art as I see it in the RP version knocks out the dirty white to just white, so that makes the layout seem off-kilter... slightly horizontal rectangle floating in a white square gives odd margins. Click it for larger version.

Edit: If they'd just let that pink background flood the cover, or at least go up to behind the Chances title, I'd like it better. I agree that they probably scoured used record stores for period examples; I wonder if it's an homage to a particular album.

Posted 12 years ago by ScottFromWyoming [ Reply ]

Oh my, my, indeeed! Love this, and the 50s artwork on the album cover.

Posted 13 years ago by unclehud [ Reply ]

the album cover is fine...

the music is fun too...

steady.

Posted 13 years ago by MiracleDrug [ Reply ]

endoboy wrote:

As a production artist, I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to say the same thing to the clueless commenters of visual art. Just because you don't like something, don't discount the skill and planning that went into it. My favorite example is the photographer Joel Peter Witkin (Whitkin?). Some of the most disturbing, grotesque stuff Ive ever seen, and very grunge, before there really was grunge, but the man had mad photography skills, before the days of Photoshop, and no mater how sick the material, it was made just the way he wanted it to be, and with great skill.

So, say you dislike it, even hate it, but don't say it sucks if you don't know the history or skills it takes to make it.

A sizable portion of the members here are graphic designers and/or artists, including the poster to whom you were responding. "Clueless" would better describe a presumption that one is the only person here who knows about "production art" or its history and required skills. I do share your frustration about uninformed criticism, however, but that seems to happen in every field.

Posted 13 years ago by Proclivities [ Reply ]

Businessgypsy wrote:

endoboy wrote:

So, say you dislike it, even hate it, but don't say it sucks if you don't know the history or skills it takes to make it.

Thanks for the vote of confidence, endoboy, but I have to point out that ScottFromWyoming is also a working designer and always makes pretty well thought out points in his debate. The input from all concerned raises the level of consciousness concerning this sometimes arcane biz considerably, and is much appreciated.

oh please...who actually buys the album for the artwork anymore...who actually buys the album anymore, period?

Posted 13 years ago by annie_fannie [ Reply ]

Love this!

Posted 13 years ago by SanchoPancho [ Reply ]

endoboy wrote:

So, say you dislike it, even hate it, but don't say it sucks if you don't know the history or skills it takes to make it.

Thanks for the vote of confidence, endoboy, but I have to point out that ScottFromWyoming is also a working designer and always makes pretty well thought out points in his debate. The input from all concerned raises the level of consciousness concerning this sometimes arcane biz considerably, and is much appreciated.

Posted 13 years ago by Businessgypsy [ Reply ]

Now that JB has decided that the money likes her lower register, she's doing much more of it. I do approve FWIW.

Posted 13 years ago by TerryS [ Reply ]

Love it! Just listen to that bass... Ohh my, my!

Posted 13 years ago by Lazaerus [ Reply ]

Great track.

Posted 13 years ago by derekd [ Reply ]

macbags wrote:

Have I grown old, or has paradise? Don't telll me its me.

sometimes I think that only a daily basis

Posted 13 years ago by Shesdifferent [ Reply ]

Businessgypsy wrote:

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

The fonts are fine. The cover's just half-finished is all. Maybe the two faces don't belong together, but there's nothing wrong with either of them. I'd actually like to know what the script is... seems like something Veer would put out but it's like finding a needle in a haystack, browsing thru font after font.

Maybe they overthought it and allowed the search for historical accuracy to overshadow mass appeal, but this is a certainty: The fonts aren't bad, as in thoughtlessly chosen. The cover's not half-finished, but finished to the standard set by Jill Barber's own concept. You may not like it from your own personal aesthetic perspective (I don't), but don't mistake the work that went into this as anything less than a professional effort to respect the recording artist's desired feel of the work.

Crikey, I thought I retired from being a Creative Director years ago. Much ado about nothing, but that's the biz.

As a production artist, I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to say the same thing to the clueless commenters of visual art. Just because you don't like something, don't discount the skill and planning that went into it. My favorite example is the photographer Joel Peter Witkin (Whitkin?). Some of the most disturbing, grotesque stuff Ive ever seen, and very grunge, before there really was grunge, but the man had mad photography skills, before the days of Photoshop, and no mater how sick the material, it was made just the way he wanted it to be, and with great skill.

So, say you dislike it, even hate it, but don't say it sucks if you don't know the history or skills it takes to make it.

Posted 13 years ago by endoboy [ Reply ]

Have I grown old, or has paradise? Don't telll me its me.

Posted 13 years ago by macbags [ Reply ]

Oh, my, my...

Posted 14 years ago by nicolewe [ Reply ]

Great record! Congratulations to Jill, who is getting married today!!!

Posted 14 years ago by Nat [ Reply ]

Reminds me of Joan Osborne .....

Posted 14 years ago by DeeCee1109 [ Reply ]

Cant't Handle this...bleech....sounds like everyone favorite hate-Katie Meula and the Oh my my's.....can't take it....MUTE

Posted 14 years ago by Shesdifferent [ Reply ]

This is just plain fun to listen to! I am always amazed at how great the selections are on RP.

Posted 14 years ago by brjoco [ Reply ]

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

The fonts are fine. The cover's just half-finished is all. Maybe the two faces don't belong together, but there's nothing wrong with either of them. I'd actually like to know what the script is... seems like something Veer would put out but it's like finding a needle in a haystack, browsing thru font after font.

Thanks for the illumination, Scott. I'd also say the cover is as the designer, art director and publisher at https://www.outside-music.com/ intended. Obviously going for a period look, and the headline over photo block was often used in cover art from 1940 - 1960 - partly because (in the days of multiple plate stripped, masked and registered film negatives), it was less costly to do the mechanical art if you weren't dropping a lot of type out of a large four-color-process photo. The combination of a woodcut style sanserif masthead and brush font script was common in the era of hot (lead letterpress type fit into a chase) type when your choices were restricted to the sizes and fonts in the typesetter's cabinet.

This is what Barber had to say about the intended feel of the recording in an interview with the Brunswickian:

Her new album has a lounge singer aspect to it - the listener feels like they are transported back to the ‘40s in a smoky hotel bar. But more than just the era itself Barber wanted to recreate the feeling of romance in the music.

"I think I've always written songs that are pretty romantic and I think that romance has been lost in a lot of modern music so I look to the old classics. I just wanted to deliver it and bring that sound back to contemporary songs," said Barber.

Given that, the art director probably researched some classic torch and ballad cover art from the period as a reference for the finished piece. Absolutely no reason for a San Francisco company like Outside, with access to top level designers locally to just accidentally do something shoddy.

Maybe they overthought it and allowed the search for historical accuracy to overshadow mass appeal, but this is a certainty: The fonts aren't bad, as in thoughtlessly chosen. The cover's not half-finished, but finished to the standard set by Jill Barber's own concept. You may not like it from your own personal aesthetic perspective (I don't), but don't mistake the work that went into this as anything less than a professional effort to respect the recording artist's desired feel of the work.

Crikey, I thought I retired from being a Creative Director years ago. Much ado about nothing, but that's the biz.

Posted 14 years ago by Businessgypsy [ Reply ]

Leslie wrote:

Music = pretty good

Fonts used on album cover = pretty bad

BillG wrote:

I'd agree pretty much, though I'd probably go with:

Music = very good

Fonts used on album cover = very bad

The fonts are fine. The cover's just half-finished is all. Maybe the two faces don't belong together, but there's nothing wrong with either of them. I'd actually like to know what the script is... seems like something Veer would put out but it's like finding a needle in a haystack, browsing thru font after font.

About Britannic Bold ...

Linotype usage sample for Britannic Com Bold

Designer: Wagner + Schmidt Foundry, 1901

Britannic Bold belongs to the Britannic Font Family which is part of the Assorted Collection.

Britannic was originally created at the beginning of the 20th Century, and comes by way of the old British foundry, Wagner + Schmidt. Today's digital version of Britannic includes five separate font styles, one of which — medium compressed — is an all caps design. Britannic is a sans serif face with a vertical axis and a high degree of stroke contrast, especially in the heavier weights. This typeface exudes a degree of elegance that has not often been matched in the century that has passed since it was first drawn.

Posted 14 years ago by ScottFromWyoming [ Reply ]

Saw Jill last night at the Yaletown Live venue in Vancouver for the Olympics... She was a character and this was one of the last songs she played in a great set. If she's in town you should bring your sweetie and check her out.

Posted 14 years ago by 3enny_3lanco [ Reply ]

She played a free show here in Vancouver on Sunday but I found out about it too late to go, oh well.

Posted 14 years ago by jim1964 [ Reply ]

sdn wrote:

Yeah. Same here.

Are your Kidding!!! The headphones are turned up and I'm doing the chair dance.

(Bill we need a chair dancing smiley!)

Posted 14 years ago by AvoidingWork [ Reply ]

Can you spell G-O-S-P-E-L?

Posted 14 years ago by ThePoose [ Reply ]

michaelgmitchell wrote:

Too much for me.

Yeah. Same here.

Posted 14 years ago by sdn [ Reply ]

Don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing!!! (and damn she got it)

Posted 14 years ago by Felix_The_Cat [ Reply ]

I think it's perty kewl!

Posted 14 years ago by sirdroseph [ Reply ]

I know most of you love it. I can't get past the repetition. Don't bring up the obvious. Just this particular track. Too much for me.

Posted 14 years ago by michaelgmitchell [ Reply ]

lmic wrote:

Aw heck, please don't blame the poor, innocent typefaces for bad overall cover design. I'm not saying they're the most elegant ever, but they do support the '40s-standard theme of the music.

They suit the theme of the cover. Thank you for correctly referring to them as "typefaces" instead of "fonts".

Posted 14 years ago by Proclivities [ Reply ]

AvoidingWork wrote:

As long as you're at your computer... https://www.jillbarber.com/

Seconded! You can listen to any and all the songs from Jill's albums on her site.

Posted 14 years ago by peter_james_bond [ Reply ]

I found the chorus repetitious and annoying... After only the first go-around.

Posted 14 years ago by Mangoman [ Reply ]

that's something special

Posted 14 years ago by michaelc [ Reply ]

200 wrote:

oh my my, i'm gonna have to let her go.

please someone do.

Posted 14 years ago by zipper [ Reply ]

avidfan wrote:

I'd LOVE to hear more of this. Wow.

As long as you're at your computer... https://www.jillbarber.com/

Posted 14 years ago by AvoidingWork [ Reply ]

Triplets of Beleville!

Posted 15 years ago by gekkosan [ Reply ]

oh my my, i'm gonna have to let her go.

Posted 15 years ago by 200 [ Reply ]

Oh my myyy....

Posted 15 years ago by derekd [ Reply ]

Wizzuvv_oz wrote:

alternates between cloying and cool for me at different times (different plays). Lands at a six and I still can't make up my mind

I feel exactly the same way about this song.

Posted 15 years ago by rtrudeau [ Reply ]

This song makes me vomit.

Posted 15 years ago by lambyrossberg [ Reply ]

alternates between cloying and cool for me at different times (different plays). Lands at a six and I still can't make up my mind

Posted 15 years ago by Wizzuvvoz [ Reply ]

peyotecoyote wrote:

sooooooooooo jealous!

Actually this is a song I didn't appreciate from the CD until I saw her play it live at the Black Sheep Inn in Wakefield, QC this winter.

(maybe 100 or so people + Jill & her band - awesome)

She oooozes warmth & earthy sexiness and this song is really 'acted out' on stage.

This song is all about delivery & she really delivers live.

Posted 15 years ago by rickf [ Reply ]

I don't mean this as an insult, but the cadence of this reminds me of a Leann Rimes song. The one where she's in the women's prison in the 1920's.

Posted 15 years ago by Jack_Jefferson [ Reply ]

I love this song. I think Measure for Measure is her best though.

Posted 15 years ago by EssenceLumin [ Reply ]

boubabe wrote:

Saw her at the Edmonton Folk Festival this weekend. She fabulous live if you ever get the chance to see her. This song is an absolute hoot as a call and response with the audience!

sooooooooooo jealous!

Posted 15 years ago by peyotecoyote [ Reply ]

The 'New Big Band' sound is way cool. I mean hep.

Posted 15 years ago by unclehud [ Reply ]

Pyro wrote:

I like her voice, but the lyrics are sorta repetitious.

He broke my heart. Oh my my. ad intinitum

yeah, except for the opposite. her voice, it do grate on a nerve.

Posted 15 years ago by zipper [ Reply ]

Saw her at the Edmonton Folk Festival this weekend. She fabulous live if you ever get the chance to see her. This song is an absolute hoot as a call and response with the audience!

Posted 15 years ago by boubabe [ Reply ]

Pyro wrote:

I like her voice, but the lyrics are sorta repetitious.

He broke my heart. Oh my my. ad intinitum

Sorry you're bored - you just don't want to hear about it, right?
But oh my my - he really did break my heart!

Posted 15 years ago by macadavy [ Reply ]

Pyro wrote:

I like her voice, but the lyrics are sorta repetitious.

He broke my heart. Oh my my. ad intinitum

Yeah, but still says a lot... not only with words but through that fascinating groove

Posted 15 years ago by Felix_The_Cat [ Reply ]

Gorgeous

Posted 15 years ago by Felix_The_Cat [ Reply ]

I like her voice, but the lyrics are sorta repetitious.

He broke my heart. Oh my my. ad intinitum

Posted 15 years ago by Pyro [ Reply ]

I'm soooo with you on that one.
EssenceLumin wrote:

I soooo love this song. I bought the cd after hearing it here on Radio Paradise. At least 1/2 of the rest of the songs are gems too.

Posted 15 years ago by derekd [ Reply ]

I soooo love this song. I bought the cd after hearing it here on Radio Paradise. At least 1/2 of the rest of the songs are gems too.

Posted 15 years ago by EssenceLumin [ Reply ]

Leslie wrote:

Fonts used on album cover = pretty bad

Aw heck, please don't blame the poor, innocent typefaces for bad overall cover design. I'm not saying they're the most elegant ever, but they do support the '40s-standard theme of the music.

Posted 15 years ago by lmic [ Reply ]

Oh Sister, where art thou?

Posted 15 years ago by MojoJojo [ Reply ]

Oh My My .... (rinse & repeat) until I want to shut the radio off
sorry Bill - Madrugada + RadioHead were amazing - this was a let down of epic scale .... I guess you cant win them all the time

Posted 15 years ago by huebdoo [ Reply ]

the real thing would be cool right now. Not this

Posted 15 years ago by Wizzuvvoz [ Reply ]

love it!!

Posted 15 years ago by Middleton [ Reply ]

Jill? Good stuff. The chorus?

Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah
Blah, blah blah, blah blah blah

Downright grating, IMHO - your mileage may vary.

Posted 15 years ago by nmcvaugh [ Reply ]

avidfan wrote:

I'd LOVE to hear more of this. Wow.

There are a couple more songs from this CD on the LRC. One is the title track and the other is called "Never Quit Loving You". Both songs are good, but my favorite is "Never Quit Loving You" and I think that would fare better on the regular playlist. However, I'm not sure if they're going to make it to the regular playlist, because they've been on the LRC for a long time.

Posted 15 years ago by peter_james_bond [ Reply ]

It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing... just QUITE doesn't get off of the ground. -6-

Posted 15 years ago by Bone [ Reply ]

I'd LOVE to hear more of this. Wow.

Posted 15 years ago by avidfan [ Reply ]

Oh My My,this chick I like! #8

Posted 15 years ago by HazzeSwede [ Reply ]

Causing a foot-tapping frenzy here ..... ${#Dancingbanana_2}$

The more it goes on the better it gets.

Posted 15 years ago by voodoodaddy [ Reply ]

Oh my myyyyy....A great RP discovery.

Posted 15 years ago by derekd [ Reply ]

Quite enjoyable! This would be nice followed by some Dr. John.

Posted 15 years ago by kaybee [ Reply ]

Posted 15 years ago by Stefen [ Reply ]

It's cute, but large parts of it scan to "When the Saints go Marching In", methinks.

Posted 15 years ago by catsoup [ Reply ]

Posted 15 years ago by zipper [ Reply ]

I thought this was Jess Klein at first, their voices are so close...

Posted 15 years ago by DaveInSaoMiguel [ Reply ]

the ritm is sufficient for a nice dancing.

Posted 15 years ago by sissyolina [ Reply ]

Leslie wrote:

Music = pretty good

Fonts used on album cover = pretty bad

I'd agree pretty much, though I'd probably go with:

Music = very good

Fonts used on album cover = very bad

Posted 15 years ago by William [ Reply ]

Music = pretty good

Fonts used on album cover = pretty bad

Posted 15 years ago by Leslie [ Reply ]

Droidac wrote:

I thought this was Joan Osbourne for a minute there....

Me too. I like it.

${#Dancingbanana_2}$

Posted 15 years ago by wilcogirl11 [ Reply ]

Bop bop bop de dop...Diggin it.

Posted 15 years ago by derekd [ Reply ]

Nice - I like this better than her faux-Sarah-Harmer stuff.

Posted 15 years ago by hcaudill [ Reply ]

Hey, my upload! Thank you Bill. nigelr wonders if this is authentic, yes, these are new original songs, and there is no sampling whatsoever. Special kudos have to go to producer Les Cooper, he wrote the arrangements for the backing band which includes a 10 piece string section. A couple of groups, the Good Lovelies and the Sojourners were brought in to provide those cool, authentic backing vocals. Les also co-wrote some songs with Jill, as did Ron Sexsmith. This song is the most uptempo number on the album. To get more of a taste of the album you can go to www.jillbarber.com where all of Jill's albums are streamed.

Posted 15 years ago by peter_james_bond [ Reply ]

Reminds me inevitably of the main theme of The Triplets of Belleville. I kept waiting for the vacumm cleaner to kick in...

Posted 15 years ago by gekkosan [ Reply ]

Mandible wrote:

I'll bet there's a correlation between high ratings and scantily clad beauties on the CD cover!

and your rating was?........

Posted 15 years ago by Wizzuvvoz [ Reply ]

Outstanding!

Posted 15 years ago by btilrn [ Reply ]

I'll bet there's a correlation between high ratings and scantily clad beauties on the CD cover!