Framed - movie guessing game
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 9:42am
Wordle - daily game
- marko86 - May 12, 2025 - 9:41am
Trump
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 9:29am
NY Times Strands
- ptooey - May 12, 2025 - 8:48am
Today in History
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:47am
Celebrity Face Recognition
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:07am
Radio Paradise Comments
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:02am
NYTimes Connections
- ptooey - May 12, 2025 - 7:42am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- rgio - May 12, 2025 - 5:46am
Global Warming
- rgio - May 12, 2025 - 4:39am
New Music
- miamizsun - May 12, 2025 - 3:47am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- winter - May 11, 2025 - 8:41pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 6:47pm
The Dragons' Roost
- triskele - May 11, 2025 - 5:58pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Manbird - May 11, 2025 - 5:26pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- epsteel - May 11, 2025 - 12:30pm
Ukraine
- R_P - May 11, 2025 - 11:03am
Things You Thought Today
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 9:52am
Breaking News
- Steely_D - May 10, 2025 - 8:52pm
May 2025 Photo Theme - Action
- fractalv - May 10, 2025 - 7:54pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - May 10, 2025 - 3:50pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 2:16pm
Israel
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 1:18pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 12:21pm
Artificial Intelligence
- q4Fry - May 10, 2025 - 10:01am
No Rock Mix on Alexa?
- epsteel - May 10, 2025 - 9:45am
Kodi Addon
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 10, 2025 - 9:19am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Isabeau - May 10, 2025 - 5:53am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 9, 2025 - 9:34pm
Immigration
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 5:35pm
Basketball
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:58pm
The Obituary Page
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:45pm
Pink Floyd
- miamizsun - May 9, 2025 - 3:52pm
Freedom of speech?
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 2:19pm
Questions.
- kurtster - May 8, 2025 - 11:56pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - May 8, 2025 - 9:08pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 7:27pm
Save NPR and PBS - SIGN THE PETITION
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 3:32pm
How about a stream of just the metadata?
- ednazarko - May 8, 2025 - 11:22am
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - May 8, 2025 - 9:23am
no-money fun
- islander - May 8, 2025 - 7:55am
UFO's / Aliens blah blah blah: BOO !
- dischuckin - May 8, 2025 - 7:03am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- miamizsun - May 8, 2025 - 5:53am
Into The Wild
- Red_Dragon - May 7, 2025 - 7:34pm
Get the Money out of Politics!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 5:06pm
What Makes You Sad?
- Antigone - May 7, 2025 - 2:58pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 2:33pm
The Perfect Government
- Proclivities - May 7, 2025 - 2:05pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 10:13am
Living in America
- islander - May 7, 2025 - 9:38am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- JimTreadwell - May 7, 2025 - 8:08am
Pakistan
- Red_Dragon - May 6, 2025 - 2:21pm
SCOTUS
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 1:53pm
Canada
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 11:00am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 10:00am
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 8:06am
What's your mood today?
- GeneP59 - May 6, 2025 - 6:57am
China
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 6:01pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 5:50pm
Song of the Day
- rgio - May 5, 2025 - 5:33am
Love the Cinco de Mayo celebration!
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:53am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:49am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:48am
The Bucket List
- Red_Dragon - May 4, 2025 - 1:08pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- winter - May 4, 2025 - 9:28am
Australia
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 11:37pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 6:52pm
Democratic Party
- Isabeau - May 3, 2025 - 5:04pm
Philly
- Proclivities - May 3, 2025 - 6:26am
Race in America
- R_P - May 2, 2025 - 12:01pm
Multi-Room AirPlay using iOS app on Mac M
- downbeat - May 2, 2025 - 8:11am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- black321 - May 1, 2025 - 6:44pm
Museum of Iconic Album Covers
- Proclivities - May 1, 2025 - 12:24pm
Regarding cats
- Isabeau - May 1, 2025 - 12:11pm
When I need a Laugh I ...
- Isabeau - May 1, 2025 - 10:37am
|
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Elsewhere »
NATO
|
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
May 8, 2026 - 1:56pm |
|
The silent projectionists
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
May 4, 2026 - 3:20pm |
|
|
|
mannixj

Location: little milton, bostock 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2026 - 9:01am |
|
islander wrote:
What's a little ethnic cleansing between business partners, right?
Your addled little mind can't wait to justify any bigoted atrocities.
That wasn't a NATO act, although major NATO countries were involved in bombing Serbia to Dumbfuckistan, I believe.
It was the first time German military got involved in a conflict on foreign territory after WWII (as US vassal nation). Back then, their Green party already recommended themselves for major future warmongering through then AuÃenminister Joschka Fischer.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2026 - 8:47am |
|
kurtster wrote:
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
What's a little ethnic cleansing between business partners, right?
Your addled little mind can't wait to justify any bigoted atrocities.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 10:04pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
thx for the reality check!
|
|
buddy

Location: Rocky Mountain Way Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 8:32pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
You can read. Pick up a history book. And I didnât say a thing about war crimes. Off the topic spin.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 8:07pm |
|
steeler wrote:
I am curious, Who is in this new coalition?
Not ignoring you. A valid question if you're not seeing or paying attention to what I am. Just not ready to start down a new rabbit hole right now.
Got work tomorrow and my monthly treatment on Wednesday that I am psyching myself up for. I'll get back to you later this week.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 7:53pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 6:52pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
+1
|
|
buddy

Location: Rocky Mountain Way Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 5:30pm |
|
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:33pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote:The Iranians don't need nukes anyway. (...)
There's a good chance that they have now changed their minds.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:22pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:
Well, it proves he felt unable to negotiate a better deal. It was true that it was going to expire in 2030, but a real deal maker could've stepped in and said, "I'll do even better than that other guy did; here are terms you'll accept and we'll both look like heroes."
But the senile felon rapist loser couldn't. So he played mobster/bully instead and now the world knows he's as impotent as his little mushroom dick.
The Iranians don't need nukes anyway. If they want to irradiate Israel all they have to do is fire enough of a missile/drone swarm at Dimona - something they are already capable of doing - to destroy it. Which they're unlikely to do, because Israel would incinerate them in return.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:01pm |
|
VV wrote:
Yes, it was working. Just because Trump proclaimed without any justification that it was not⦠doesnât negate that fact.
Well, it proves he felt unable to negotiate a better deal. It was true that it was going to expire in 2030, but a real deal maker could've stepped in and said, "I'll do even better than that other guy did; here are terms you'll accept and we'll both look like heroes."
But the senile felon rapist loser couldn't. So he played mobster/bully instead and now the world knows he's as impotent as his little mushroom dick.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 3:52pm |
|
Blaming Europe for your own quagmire. Bring back those Freedom Friesâ¢!
|
|
VV

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 2:24pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
You actually believe that the Treaty was working ? Tell me again how ? It was only designed to put a temporay hold on weapons projects not end them.
You believe the Iranians more than the US ? Yeah like their missiles can't go very far and that they are good to their people and their neighbors.
This was never going to end well. Better it gets done now and executed by a team that is willing to actually fight and win for a change. This is a global paradigm shift underway and I would much rather have us calling the shots than anyone else. The US has proved its capabilities and can go alone if need be. Evidently we have to go alone, but not really. We have a new coalition who understands the actual problem and is willing to do something about it. NATO sure as hell doesn't. And NATO, even though it was designed to keep Russia at bay was eating out of Russia's hands by getting their cheaper oil and nat gas that helped finance the war in Ukraine. We finally shamed them into getting off of Russia's energy teet and they're pissed off about it. The Western European part (old) of NATO doesn't give a flying fuck about Ukraine. The old Eastern Bloc part gets it though. Old NATO is more than happy to let Ukraine go back to the Russians as was Biden.
Old NATO doesn't care about Iran becoming the next North Korea, cuz they won't. The difference between the two is that NK wants their nukes as a defensive deterrent and the Iranians want to use them as an offensive weapon. NATO just thinks that the Iranians only want to go after Israel and the US and that they are safe from any Iranian threats. Yeah, ok ...
You all seriously have your wires crossed badly. My take is completely different than the rest of you all and you don't see anything the way I do with this. I guess that we will have to agree to disagree, except that you all won't let it go at that. You'll keep pounding me to see it your way until I do cuz you can't help yourselves but it just ain't gonna happen.
Later.
Yes, it was working. Just because Trump proclaimed without any justification that it was not⦠doesnât negate that fact.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 1:50pm |
|
rgio wrote:
Kristi Noem has it all under control. Everyone says nobody has ever seen anything like it. The best people... they're amazing.
You know, the parent of one of those men deployed to Iran, they came up to me with tears in their eyes.
Not a joke.
|
|
rgio

Location: West Jersey Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 1:25pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:
New World Order, of course. Chaired by the Board of Peace. Itâll all be happening in two weeks. They have a concept of a plan. Everyone says so.
Kristi Noem has it all under control. Everyone says nobody has ever seen anything like it. The best people... they're amazing.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 1:09pm |
|
steeler wrote:
I am curious, Who is in this new coalition?
New World Order, of course. Chaired by the Board of Peace. Itâll all be happening in two weeks. They have a concept of a plan. Everyone says so.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 12:42pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
You actually believe that the Treaty was working ? Tell me again how ? It was only designed to put a temporay hold on weapons projects not end them.
You believe the Iranians more than the US ? Yeah like their missiles can't go very far and that they are good to their people and their neighbors.
This was never going to end well. Better it gets done now and executed by a team that is willing to actually fight and win for a change. This is a global paradigm shift underway and I would much rather have us calling the shots than anyone else. The US has proved its capabilities and can go alone if need be. Evidently we have to go alone, but not really. We have a new coalition who understands the actual problem and is willing to do something about it. NATO sure as hell doesn't. And NATO, even though it was designed to keep Russia at bay was eating out of Russia's hands by getting their cheaper oil and nat gas that helped finance the war in Ukraine. We finally shamed them into getting off of Russia's energy teet and they're pissed off about it. The Western European part (old) of NATO doesn't give a flying fuck about Ukraine. The old Eastern Bloc part gets it though. Old NATO is more than happy to let Ukraine go back to the Russians as was Biden.
Old NATO doesn't care about Iran becoming the next North Korea, cuz they won't. The difference between the two is that NK wants their nukes as a defensive deterrent and the Iranians want to use them as an offensive weapon. NATO just thinks that the Iranians only want to go after Israel and the US and that they are safe from any Iranian threats. Yeah, ok ...
You all seriously have your wires crossed badly. My take is completely different than the rest of you all and you don't see anything the way I do with this. I guess that we will have to agree to disagree, except that you all won't let it go at that. You'll keep pounding me to see it your way until I do cuz you can't help yourselves but it just ain't gonna happen.
Later.
I am curious, Who is in this new coalition?
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 12:12pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
Here is the stumbling block to having any conversation between me and the rest of you.
You all have bought into the Trump is Putin's Puppet BS. And it is the foundation for all of your conclusions.
It prevents you from seeing it any other way, such as in a way I might. It is proven BS, yet the lie continues and is still actively nurtured by those who started it for their own benefit. And none of you can't get past it nor want to because you all have so much time and energy invested in it. That and none of you can admit that you were wrong about it, either.
.
So that's my story and I'm sticking to it. The same as you all stick to the Trump is Putin's Puppet BS.
Now I'm done.
 Dave
Kurtster, as I tried to explain to Richard the other day.. I am NOT saying Trump is Putin's lapdog /bitch / puppet.
He doesn't have to be for they are soulmates. They share the same values. Mobster rule veneered over with paper thin religious conservatism. Exactly the same flavour.
|
|
Warning: pg_close(): supplied resource is not a valid PostgreSQL link resource in /var/www/html/rp3.php on line 474
|